We have Arabs (who knows if they are future terrorists) crossing the southwestern American border every day ILLEGALLY.
Aprox. 1.5 million illegals (mostly from Latin America) get through our borders every year and the Bush administration is doing NOTHING about it!
Why does America need to station 63,000 troops in Germany, 50 years after WWII? Why do we have 11,000 troops sunning themselves in Italy? Why do we have another 11,000 troops sitting it out in Great Britain? Why does America need to have 40,000 soldiers in Japan? Why are 38,000 G.I.s still in South Korea? Why 2,000 in Turkey?
Why are American taxpayers guarding the borders of other countries (with your money) around the world but ours???
Why can't we have a few of our troops in the USA/Mexico border?

Is that so wrong, difficult..or racist???
1 2
Just for you Ron:
We are wide open, and the administration is so wrapped up in the one world government, and oil deals, security for business that is of government interests and big contributions, anything but taking care of American
Citizens, or the United States of America. Our own elected officials put their re-elections and their special interests far before they even think of their constituents, or American Citizens in general.
In actuality, what we have today, is Government of the government, for the government, and by the government,
and God forbid that the citizenry hear what is actually going on, or question the actions of government officials.
and thusly, the following is more than possible, and very probably already happening..!!
**
All that a bunch of ragheads need to do is take the towels off heir heads and learn to speak Spanish with a
mexicaneer accent, and their home free... Go right to the mexicaneer consulate and get ID cards. Could even do it in mass, and nobody would pay attention, move all 19 or however many into the same house, buy a pickup and a van, and all ride around together, and nobody will pay attention, cause they look like a bunch of government protected mexicaneers.
Can drive back and forth across the border carrying whatever, as the border patrol does little to stop, or
inspect what mexicaneers are carrying or where they are going... and if stopped, just use the mexicaneer ID, and they will let them go... Heck the terrorists would not even have a problem transferring money with their new mexicaneer ID cards, as congress and the senate are trying to make it easier for mexicaneers to send money back and forth electronically...
And for cover, the whole bunch could go get a job
in mass as a crew of house framers, brick layers, roofers, tile layers, and sheet rockers, or painters. And be protected by state and federal government folks at every point in their travels. Probably give the whole bunch a job cleaning runways or as ramp service, or aircraft cleaners. Or even a group job on a US military base.

Gee Whizz, aren't illegal criminal aliens fun... Just be one of the mexicaneers, and the US government will protect you, feed you, give you medical care, house you, and give you driver licenses. Will even print signs in your native Spanish, and also all the forms that you might need while you travel around The United States of America. And not even have to worry about the IRS coming after your dollars for the taxes that you should have paid... Chee Vhiss, I vunder if der ragheads might have already thought of this..The might be real radical, but they aren't all real stupid..
Pablito
**
We have Arabs (who knows if they are future terrorists) crossing the southwestern American border every day ILLEGALLY. Aprox. 1.5 ... ours??? Why can't we have a few of our troops in the USA/Mexico border? Is that so wrong, difficult..or racist???

Undue Influence
http://www.thesocialcontract.com/cgi-bin/showarticle.pl?articleID=1122&terms
We have Arabs (who knows if they are future terrorists) crossing the southwestern American border every day ILLEGALLY. Aprox. 1.5 ... your money) around the world but ours??? Why can't we have a few of our troops in the USA/Mexico border?

We do have troops on the USA/Mexico border, do some research on JTF 6. I was deployed to work with the TF in the early '90s and i know it is still in operation today.
Why can't we have a few of our troops in the USA/Mexico border? Is that so wrong, difficult..or racist???

Err... no, how about impractical.
Do you have any clue what 'securing' the border with US troops entails?
2000 miles of border, hot dusty nastiness. Let's say you put a fireteam every 1/4 mile or even 1/2 mile? 24 hours a day, 365 days a year? Thats about a company every 2 miles, 1000 companies, or 333 battalions or 33 divisions? The entire US regular, reserve and national guard to secure the US/Mexico border.
Then you have 4000 miles of Canadian/US border, another 1000 plus miles of Alaskan/Canadian border oh and by the way some 6000 to 7000 miles of sea coast. Got another 180 divisions handy? Then lets build bases every 50 to 100 miles to support these troops, improve the road net to transport them (or buy a whole *** load of helos) something like 140 new bases and 14000 miles of road..
And that only stops the poor folk who have to resort to walking across the border. All the 9/11 terrorists flew in, in the comfort of US air carriers, legally and openly. Want to round up every Arabic man (and women) in America? Oh by the way, their are plenty of non-arabic muslims, some of them as militant and violent as the usual suspects. So lets round up all muslims (black america will really love this).

And then, since the 2nd or 3rd worse terrorist attack in the US was from a blond, blue eyed veteran, lets round up all ..

Get the point?
Why can't we have a few of our troops in the USA/Mexico border? Is that so wrong, difficult..or racist???

Err... no, how about impractical. Do you have any clue what 'securing' the border with US troops entails? 2000 miles ... terrorist attack in the US was from a blond, blue eyed veteran, lets round up all .. Get the point?

No, I don't...by the way...I don't see the jew as any less of a danger to America than the moslem...Emotion: surprise))
I really think we need a time out from all immigration for at least 7 years, and, the swift deportation of all foreign nationals in the USA illegally! If we can't get a moratorium on immigration, then we need the numbers of immigrants reduced to a manageable number.

We tend to forget that between 1923 and 1965, the United States had very restrictive immigration laws that were enforced by our government.

Today, our government, on the federal, state and local level is not even enforcing the laws against foreign nationals who are in the United States illegally!
A foreign national who is in the United States illegally is not an immigrant they are criminals who have broken the law by entering the USA illegally. They need to be arrested and swiftly deported.

I don't see the needfor massive numbers of US troops on the borders, if the federal, state and local police enforced the law.

The only thing you would need the military for is in dealing with the Mexican army and Mexican police(a very loose term) when their role in drug and people smuggling is exposed. Of course, a certain small percent American politicians, including a few American military politicians may not want their connections to the drug and people smuggling business exposed either.
So, you're claiming that the Bush admin has gotten rid of the INS and the border patrol folks?

Er...where are all these 11,000 troops that you think are over here?

Mike

M.J.Powell
We have Arabs (who knows if they are future terrorists) crossing the southwestern American border every day ILLEGALLY. Aprox. 1.5 million illegals (mostly from Latin America) get through our borders every year and the Bush administration is doing NOTHING about it!

Read the September 2003 issue of National Geographic on modern slavery. It will give you an idea of why the problem you describe persists and even thrives in the US.
Why does America need to station 63,000 troops in Germany, 50 years after WWII? Why do we have 11,000 troops ... America need to have 40,000 soldiers in Japan? Why are 38,000 G.I.s still in South Korea? Why 2,000 in Turkey?

In this time and day the host countries aren't too enamored about having American bases and troops on their soil either. But Uncle Sam wants to keep the status quo and "friendly" countries (Germany, Italy, GB, Japan, Korea) find it a political and economic hot potato to insist that the Americans leave.
Why are American taxpayers guarding the borders of other countries (with your money) around the world but ours???

The US armed forces are too large to base them all on US soil. So you guys go looking for trouble (aka wars to fight) to keep them from creating a problem domestically. You'll disagree but that's what the rest of the world sees you as.
Why can't we have a few of our troops in the USA/Mexico border? Is that so wrong, difficult..or racist???

That would mean martial law within the US. Soldiers should not be used as policemen.
We have Arabs (who knows if they are future terrorists) ... year and the Bush administration is doing NOTHING about it!

Read the September 2003 issue of National Geographic on modern slavery. It will give you an idea of why the problem you describe persists and even thrives in the US.

We already fought one war over slavery in this country. And history does have a way of repeating itself.
So when does Operation Mexican Freedom start?
Why does America need to station 63,000 troops in Germany, ... 38,000 G.I.s still in South Korea? Why 2,000 in Turkey?

In this time and day the host countries aren't too enamored about having American bases and troops on their soil ... countries (Germany, Italy, GB, Japan, Korea) find it a political and economic hot potato to insist that the Americans leave.

Damn shame military personnel can't mutiny and then no one would have to worry about being politically correct.
Why are American taxpayers guarding the borders of other countries (with your money) around the world but ours???

The US armed forces are too large to base them all on US soil. So you guys go looking for ... keep them from creating a problem domestically. You'll disagree but that's what the rest of the world sees you as.

Yeah, you are probably right about keeping them over seas to prevent them from being "domestic" problems. If we brought our military home the ranks of organizations such as Ranch Rescue and CHD would swell to bursting and the plot of the Mexican and American governments to create a slave continent would meet sudden death.
Why can't we have a few of our troops in the USA/Mexico border? Is that so wrong, difficult..or racist???

That would mean martial law within the US. Soldiers should not be used as policemen.

We don't need policemen on the border. What is coming across the border is an invasion by a foreign country and is tantamount to declaration of war, which requires soldiers. Lots of them. With orders to shoot to kill.
Mostrar más